monkeytyping

Monkeytype vs TypeRacer: Which Should You Use?

One is a minimal solo test you can customize endlessly. The other is a live multiplayer race that has been running since 2008. Here is how they actually differ, and why your WPM will not match between them.

The short version

wpm gap 10-20 typical loss moving from Monkeytype to TypeRacer
typeracer launched 2008 it invented the live typing race
monkeytype word lists 446 plus quotes in 87 languages
typeracer languages 52 each with its own leaderboard

Both sites are free, both measure honestly, and the two numbers they hand you will not match. The rest of this page is about why.

The core difference

Monkeytype and TypeRacer are both free typing sites, but they are built around opposite ideas of what typing practice is. Monkeytype is a solo instrument: a minimal, distraction free test over common English words by default, with an enormous settings surface (timed, word count, quote, and zen modes, 187 themes, hundreds of layouts and languages) so you can shape the test to your taste. You race nobody but your own personal best.

TypeRacer is a competition. You are matched into a live race against two to five real people, everyone types the same quote, and cartoon cars advance across a track as you go. The text is drawn from a pool of thousands of book, film, and quote excerpts, complete with capitals and punctuation. The energy is completely different: a Monkeytype session feels like meditation, a TypeRacer session feels like a starting gun.

Why your WPM differs between them

Type on both sites in the same sitting and you will likely score noticeably higher on Monkeytype. Losing 10 to 20 WPM on TypeRacer is a typical range, and it comes from three design choices rather than measurement error.

  • Text difficulty. Monkeytype's default test uses lowercase common words with no punctuation. TypeRacer serves real prose with capitals, commas, apostrophes, and the occasional semicolon, and every shifted character slows you down.
  • Forced correction. On TypeRacer you cannot progress past an error: the input box turns red and your car stops until you backspace and fix it. On Monkeytype an uncorrected word costs accuracy and that word's credit, but the clock damage of a mistake is far smaller.
  • Timing details. TypeRacer measures the time to complete the whole passage, and your reaction to the starting light is folded into your first word. Network latency can shave a little more.

If you want to close the gap, practice with punctuation enabled on the punctuation typing test or type real prose on the paragraph practice page, and check what a given score means on the typing speed chart.

Feature comparison

Feature Monkeytype TypeRacer
Core format Solo tests: time, words, quotes, custom, zen Live multiplayer races over quotes, plus solo practice
Languages 446 word lists, quotes in 87 languages About 52 languages with per-language leaderboards
Accounts Optional; history and leaderboards need login Optional; guest and practice scores are not saved
Ads Opt-in, result screen by default Display ads for free users, removed by premium
Stats WPM, raw, accuracy, consistency, per-second graph WPM, accuracy, points, race history for members
Interface Modern, minimal, heavily themeable Functional but dated, fixed-width, 2008 era

Who each one suits

Pick Monkeytype if you are grinding for speed on your own terms. The instant restart loop, the quiet interface, and settings like punctuation toggles and custom texts make it the best pure practice instrument for typists who already have solid technique and want to push from 70 WPM toward 100 and beyond.

Pick TypeRacer if competition is what gets you to practice. Racing visible opponents is motivating in a way a timer never is, its quote texts train the punctuation and capitals that word lists skip, and its anti-cheat keeps the leaderboards honest. Accept the dated interface and the ads as the entry fee.

A third option fits people who want neither a bare test nor a race, but a path: full disclosure, that is what we built this site for. MonkeyTyping pairs a Monkeytype-style instant test with free structured touch typing lessons and persistent per-key and per-finger analytics on your stats page, no signup required. If you are comparing more sites, our Monkeytype alternatives roundup covers six of them honestly.

Whichever you choose, benchmark yourself the same way each time: same site, same duration, same text style. A 1 minute test is the standard sprint check, and a 5 minute test shows the sustained speed employers actually ask about.

Practice what the gap exposes

Questions people ask

Why is my TypeRacer WPM lower than Monkeytype?

Three reasons. TypeRacer uses real quotes with punctuation and capitals while Monkeytype defaults to lowercase common words; TypeRacer makes you fix every error before you can continue, so mistakes cost seconds instead of just accuracy; and its timer includes your reaction to the starting light. A gap of 10 to 20 WPM between the two is a typical range, not a sign anything is wrong.

Is TypeRacer free?

Yes. Anyone can race as a guest with no account, supported by display ads. A premium subscription (reported around $12 per year historically) removes ads and saves practice-mode scores, which free accounts do not keep.

Can you play TypeRacer solo?

Yes. Its practice mode starts on your first keystroke and supports ghost racing against your own previous run. Note that practice scores are only saved for premium subscribers.

Which is more accurate, Monkeytype or TypeRacer?

Both measure honestly; they just measure different things. Monkeytype reports sprint speed over common words, while TypeRacer reports fully corrected speed over punctuated prose, which is closer to real-world typing. For how these formulas work, see how typing speed is measured.

Is Monkeytype good for beginners?

Not especially. It has no lessons or finger guidance, and its hundred-plus settings can overwhelm a new typist. Beginners usually do better starting with a structured course such as the free touch typing lessons here, then graduating to test sites for speed work.